Innovative Civic Education Strategies in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61253/cendekiawan.v3i4.433Keywords:
Civic Education, Elementary School, Inqury Learning, Rights and ResponsibilitiesAbstract
The development of civic competence at the primary school level is often stuck in rote learning that does not encourage the internalization of the values of rights, obligations, and responsibilities as democratic citizens. This study aims to explore the application of the inquiry approach as an innovative strategy in civic education to improve students' understanding of these basic civic concepts. Using a qualitative research design with a case study approach, data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis involving teachers and students in one primary school in Kendari City, Indonesia. Data analysis was conducted to identify the main themes that emerged. The results showed that the inquiry approach encouraged students to construct knowledge through reflection, dialog, and contextual exploration. Students were able to connect personal experiences with the concepts of rights, obligations, and responsibilities in a meaningful way, and showed improved critical thinking skills and active participation. This research contributes to strengthening the theory of civic education and provides practical implications in designing learning that is oriented towards democratic values from an early age.References
Assingkily, M. S. (2021). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Panduan Menulis Artikel Ilmiah dan Tugas Akhir. Yogyakarta: K-Media.
Assingkily, M. S. (2021). Pembelajaran PKn MI: Tinjauan Konsep dan Konteks Kurikulum Kampus Merdeka. Medan: CV. Pusdikra Mitra Jaya.
Astarita, C., Helfina, S., Mirwan, M., Umaternate, F., & Assingkily, M. S. (2024). Pancasila Sebagai Filsafat: Tinjauan Analisis Pemahaman dan Sikap Mahasiswa. Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research, 01, 86–93. https://ziaresearch.or.id/index.php/fatih.
Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, Group Identity, and Citizenship Education in a Global Age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. Jossey-Bass.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Journell, W. (2016). Teaching the controversial: A guide to cultivating critical thinking and discussion in the classroom. Routledge.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful and Manageable Assessment through Cooperative Learning. ASCD.
Kerr, D. (2003). Citizenship education in England: The case for a national curriculum. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 347-369.
Kerr, D. (1999). Citizenship Education: An International Comparison. NFER
Lewin, T., & Stryker, D. (2018). Inquiry-based learning in K-12 education: The role of technology. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 225-240.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Noddings, N. (2005). The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. Teachers College Press.
QSR International. (2020). NVivo 12 for Windows: Getting Started.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Suryadi, D. (2022). Merdeka Belajar: A New Approach to Education in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Reform, 19(2), 102-115.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tri Putri, Maulida Rizqia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All names and e-mail address that stated in this Journal portal specifically will be used for journal publication purposes and will be not used for other purposes or any irresponsible parties








