Literasi Digital di Era Kecerdasan Buatan: Sebuah Studi Kualitatif di Kalangan Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61253/jcgcs.v5i1.1126Kata Kunci:
Etika Akademik, Kecerdasan Buatan, Kualitatif, Literasi DigitalAbstrak
Meskipun penelitian tentang literasi digital di pendidikan tinggi semakin banyak, hanya sedikit bukti empiris yang mengeksplorasi persepsi mahasiswa terhadap teknologi berbasis AI dari dimensi kognitif, teknis, dan sosio-emosional khususnya dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi Islam di Indonesia. Untuk mengisi kesenjangan ini, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana mahasiswa di Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kendari memahami dan menavigasi literasi digital di era kecerdasan buatan. Observasi dan wawancara mendalam dilakukan sebagai metode pengumpulan data utama yang melibatkan delapan informan mahasiswa dari berbagai program studi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi literasi digital mahasiswa dapat dipetakan ke dalam lima tema utama: pengetahuan dan pemahaman tentang AI, penggunaan AI dalam bidang akademik, berpikir kritis terhadap konten yang dihasilkan AI, etika penggunaan AI, dan tantangan serta harapan mahasiswa. Yang menarik, mahasiswa dari lembaga pendidikan tinggi Islam ini secara spontan mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai Islam ke dalam kerangka etika penggunaan AI adalah sebuah dimensi yang jarang dibahas dalam literatur yang ada. Penelitian ini tidak hanya memberikan kontribusi secara empiris dan kontekstual, tetapi juga membawa implikasi bagi kebijakan kurikulum literasi digital di lembaga pendidikan tinggi Islam.
Referensi
Ahmadi, A. (2024). Unravelling the mysteries of hallucination in large language models: strategies for precision in artificial intelligence language generation. Asian Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 13(1), 1–10.
Batmang, B., Sultan, M., Azis, A., & Gunawan, F. (2021). Perceptions of pre-service teachers on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1595
Beetham, H. S., Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. routledge London.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2014). Handbook of research on new literacies. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.
Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub. New York.
González-Lloret, M. (2019). Technology and L2 pragmatics learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 113–127.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
Latif, Y. A. (2025). Hallucinations in large language models and their influence on legal reasoning: Examining the risks of ai-generated factual inaccuracies in judicial processes. Journal of Computational Intelligence, Machine Reasoning, and Decision-Making, 10(2), 10–20.
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., & Forcier, L. B. (2018). An argument for AI in education. UCL Knowledge Lab.[Google Scholar].
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.
Martínez-Bravo, M. C., Sádaba Chalezquer, C., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2022). Dimensions of digital literacy in the 21st century competency frameworks. Sustainability, 14(3), 1867.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
Olofinnika, A. A. (2025). Digital Literacy and Socio-Emotional Development in Nigeria Early Childhood Education. SustainE, 3(3).
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. penguin UK.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6.
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sørensen, M. T. (2017). The Students’ Choice of Technology A pragmatic and outcome-focused Approach. In The digital turn in higher education: International perspectives on learning and teaching in a changing world (pp. 161–174). Springer.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023a). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023b). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15.
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking (Vol. 27). Council of Europe Strasbourg.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
